THE LAWYERS WEEKLY
May 18, 2012 | 21
BUSINESS
CAREERS
Double tax treaties typically
contain provisions for exchange
of information. The precise language depends upon whether the
treaty partners use the OECD or
the UN model as the starting
point. Each of the models has
protective and procedural safeguards, but with substantial variations because of the constitutional structure of each country.
Canada and the United States,
which follow the OECD model,
have agreed to co-operate in their
attempts to deal with avoidance or
evasion of their respective taxes.
The Canada-U.S. treaty has broad
powers that are necessary to prevent fraud and properly administer
fiscal statutes. Article XVII enables
each country to obtain relevant
information so that they can properly administer their taxes.
VERN
KRISHNA
The type of information that
the two countries can exchange
is much broader than the scope
of Article I of the Canada-U.S.
treaty. For example, the two
countries can exchange information on persons that the treaty
does not cover or who do not
even reside in either country.
The exchange rules apply to all
taxes. This includes Canadian
excise taxes, U.S. taxes on estates
and gifts, taxes under the
Internal Revenue Code and social
security and excise taxes, as well
as income taxes.
The countries must treat any
information they exchange in the
same manner as it is treated
under domestic laws. They may,
however, disclose the information to persons who assess, collect or administer taxes and to
those involved in tax litigation.
Legislative bodies and their
agents who administer taxes can
also access any information that
they consider necessary to carry
out their oversight responsibilities. Such bodies and agencies,
however, can use the information only for the purposes of
administering taxes.
Neither country need supply
information that would disclose a
trade secret or the disclosure of
which would be contrary to public policy.
Article XXVII protects any
information that Canada receives
in confidence from the Internal
Revenue Service. However, the
treaty does not consider informa-
tion as secret unless it contains
information that Canada receives
in confidence, the contents of
which would be revealed by the
disclosure of the Canadian infor-
mation. Therefore, Canadian
information may be available in
accordance with the applicable
domestic law governing confi-
dential information, such as the
Income Tax Act or the Access to
Information Act. Under the
domestic law of the United States,
any information exchanged pur-
suant to a tax convention is pro-
tected from disclosure.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
RT
is building
their team.
We are pleased to have
Jason Beeho join us as a
partner in our growing
firm. He enjoys helping
clients solve problems
in employment law and
workplace human rights.
Jason brings a real-world
sensibility to legal and
business issues and is as
comfortable with a CEO
as he is on a job-site. A
talented negotiator, he is
also a staunch advocate
when complicated
workplace disputes arise.
We are thrilled to have
Jason join the Rubin
Thomlinson team of experts
in employment law and
workplace human rights.
Rubin Thomlinson LLP
www.rubinthomlinson.com
(416) 847-1814
20 Adelaide St. East, Suite 1104
Toronto, Ontario
M5C 2T6