Unlicensed information
technology can create
unfair competition
MICHAEL BENEDICT
A legal battle over a $51,000
life insurance policy awarded to
a man who killed his wife is
returning to the Ontario
Superior Court, in an unusual
case involving the rights of
people found not criminally
responsible for their acts.
The Ontario Ministry of the
Attorney General is seeking a forfeiture order in Superior Court of
the life insurance payout to Ved
Dhinghra under the Civil Remedies Act because it says the
money represents proceeds of
unlawful activity.
The province made the
announcement a day after the
Ontario Court of Appeal ruled
that Dhinghra was entitled to the
money from a policy on his late
wife, because he was found not
criminally responsible when, at
the age of 66, he stabbed his
56-year-old wife to death in 2006.
The public policy rule that
one cannot benefit from one’s
crime did not apply in these circumstances, the Court of Appeal
concluded in Dhingra v. Dhingra
Estate, 2012 ONCA 261.
“If a person found not crimin-
ally responsible on account of
mental disorder is not ‘morally
responsible’ for his or her act,
there is no rationale for applying
the rule of public policy,” Justice
Marc Rosenberg wrote on behalf
of the three-judge panel, in the
decision issued April 24.
Justice Rosenberg added that
Superior Court Justice Andra
Pollak was wrong to say that
Dhingra had “committed second
degree murder” and, as a result,
deny him the insurance payout
on public policy grounds. However, the court stayed its order
for 30 days to allow the Attorney
Civil Remedies Act used
in claim for murdered
woman’s policy payout CROSS-BORDER
Business travellers
wise to choose
words carefully
See CRA Page 3
THE LAWYERS WEEKLY
Vol. 22, No. 27 NEWS FOR THE LEGAL PROFESSION December 6, 2002
PAGE 10
PAGE 14
JOBS
Sundhu climbs back from ignominy
Former judge returns
to private practice
See Diversity Page 8
THE LAWYERS WEEKLY
in human rights arena
BRENDA CRAIG KAMLOOPS, B.C.
On the morning of Feb. 18,
2006, Bill Sundhu, then a provincial court judge in Kamloops,
called his wife with an urgent
plea: He had just been released
from the Vancouver drunk tank
and he needed her help. “You have
every right to be angry,” he recalls
telling her. “Right now, I need you
to be on my side. Pick me up at the
airport, and don’t bring the kids.
The media might be there.”
VOL. 22, NO. 27 NEWS FOR THE LEGAL PROFESSION DECEMBER 6, 2002
VOL. 22, NO. 27 NEWS FOR THE LEGAL PROFESSION DECEMBER 6, 2002
His spotless career as a provincial court judge was about to
become indelibly stained because
of a drunken evening at the Four
Seasons hotel in Vancouver.
Articling jobs are scarce
ROAD MAP
“I woke up in a police cell. I
had a cut on my lip and blood on
my shirt,” Sundhu recalls. “They
handed me my watch and my
belt. Then I was nudged out the
door and there was the sunshine—and there were the TV
cameras.” Global News had found
out that Vancouver police had a
judge in jail.
THE LAWYERS WEEKLY
Bill Sundhu, in the courthouse law library in Kamloops B.C., where he practises criminal law and human rights cases.
BRENDA CRAIG FOR THE LAWYERS WEEKLY
He has “no recollection” of
that night. But a summary of an
investigation by the Office of the
Chief Judge (of the Provincial
Court), made public in 2007, said
that Sundhu was verbally abusive
to a female employee and patron
at the hotel and that he later tried
to intimidate police by threaten-
ing their jobs.
“When I read the police report,
I couldn’t believe I could behave
like such an ass.”
In 2007, Sundhu stepped down
amid a protracted investigation
into his fitness to serve as a judge.
Thus ended what was described at
the time as an unblemished,
10-year stint on the bench, pre-
ceded by an impressive law career
and an advocate for social equal-
ity. His resignation was called
“tragic” by then-attorney general
Wally Oppal. “I question whether
a resignation was in order,” Oppal
said publicly at the time.
For Sundhu, his departure
from the bench was more than a
stunning personal blow — the
circumstances surrounding it
also rocked his faith in the legal
system and reinforced his view
PUBLICATIONS MAIL AGREEMENT NO. 40065517
PAGE 20
You can take back your
career by changing your
practice area
PAGE 21
To ensure your clients get the most comprehensive coverage in one title insurance policy,
take a look at the TitlePLUS® Program1, your Bar-related® real estate partner!
1-800-410-1013
titleplus.ca
1 Please refer to the policy for full details, including actual terms and conditions. The TitlePLUS policy is underwritten by Lawyers’ Professional Indemnity Company (LAWPRO®)/
Assurance LAWPRO®. Assurance LAWPRO is the registered name used in Québec by Lawyers' Professional Indemnity Company. Contact LAWPRO for brokers in Saskatchewan,
Manitoba, Alberta and Québec. TitlePLUS policies issued with respect to properties in Québec and OwnerEXPRESS® policies do not include legal services coverage.
® TitlePLUS, the TitlePLUS logo, OwnerEXPRESS, LAWPRO and Assurance LAWPRO are registered trademarks of Lawyers' Professional Indemnity Company.
® BAR-RELATED Mark is a registered Mark of North American Bar Related Title Insurers used by LAWPRO under License.
To subscribe to The Lawyers Weekly, visit
www.lawyersweekly.ca/subscribe