PAC9012 / IS TOCKPHOTO. COM
Courts shed light on consultation
Ever since the Supreme Court’s
landmark Haida decision in 2004,
companies, governments and
aboriginal communities have been
making sense of the “duty to consult” when a contemplated action
may adversely affect an aboriginal
right or title.
A scan of the financial section
of Canadian daily newspapers
shows that, while some compan-
ies are consulting about environ-
mental impacts and entering into
agreements with aboriginal com-
munities to provide employment,
very challenging.
JULI
ABOUCHAR
When silence isn’t golden
After weeks of procedural
delays — during which drilling
continued — Wahgoshig First
Nation (WFN) won an injunction against Solid Gold Resources
Corp. to halt all mineral exploration on Crown lands south of its
reserve on the shores of Lake Abi-tibi in Northern Ontario, near the
Quebec border.
In its action, WFN said
the company’s drilling could
have an adverse effect on
its treaty and aboriginal
rights, disrupt hunting
and trapping, and perma-
nently damage burial and
other sacred sites. It
sought to enjoin Solid
Gold from further explor-
ation for its failure to con-
sult or accommodate.
Solid Gold’s Legacy
WMFN was concerned
about the impacts that
mining exploration
could have on the
hunting of caribou in
an area southwest of
Moberly Lake near
Chetwynd, B.C.
“
advised Solid Gold to contact WFN
regarding its intended mineral
exploration — and offered to facilitate the process — no consultations
were undertaken before drilling
began in the spring of 2011. Solid
Gold argued that granting injunctive relief would essentially shut
down its operations and that the
Mining Act establishes a “free
entry” system in Ontario whereby
all Crown lands are open for prospecting and staking.
In an Ontario Superior Court
decision released Jan. 3, Justice
Since the injunction, a
facilitator was brought in
and discussions involving
Sold Gold, Wahgoshig and
the Ontario government are
continuing. The injunction
is set to expire in early May.
fully sought a stay of a permit for
advanced exploration proposed by
First Coal Corp. on Crown lands
where WMFN has treaty rights to
hunt. WMFN was concerned about
the impacts that mining exploration could have on the hunting of
caribou in an area southwest of
Moberly Lake near Chetwynd, B.C.
The majority (two to one) of
the B.C. Court of Appeal confirmed the lower court’s decision
to stay the permit. The Supreme
Court of Canada denied leave to
appeal the decision in February,
so the B.C. Court of Appeal
decision stands.
See Duty
Page 15
Juli Abouchar, Willms & Shier
Environmental Lawyers LLP
project comprises 103 unpatented
mining claims covering 21,790 hectares within WFN’s traditional territory. Drilling was occurring on
lands deemed by the Ministry of
Natural Resources as an “area of
cultural heritage potential” and
which WFN says encompass the
core of its cultural identity.
Although the Crown had
No action but there’s talk
West Moberly First
Nations (WMFN) success-