TALKING TO KIDS
Why judges need
to talk to kids
HIRING
SMARTPENS
CRISTIN SCHMITZ OTTAWA
Novel ad hoc breach of fiduciary duty claims against governments will “rarely” succeed and
judges should not permit “
speculative” or “hopeless” claims to
proceed to trial, the Supreme
Court has admonished.
On May 12 the top court left
the door ajar for such fiduciary
duties to be imposed on govern-
ments in future, but emphasized
that “the circumstances in which
this will occur are few.”
The court’s 9-0 judgment in
Alberta v. Elder Advocates of
Alberta Society permits a multi-
million-dollar class action
brought by Alberta nursing home
residents against the province to
proceed to trial with the plain-
tiffs’ unjust enrichment and s. 15
Charter equality rights claims.
But in partially allowing
Alberta’s appeal against the cer-
tification of the class action, the
high court struck out, for dis-
closing no cause of action, the
plaintiffs’ other pleas that the
Crown was negligent, acted in
bad faith in exercising its dis-
cretion and breached its fiduci-
ary duty to them.
The class comprises more
than 12,500 people who have
resided at provincial long-term
care facilities since Aug. 1, 2003.
They (or their estates) contend
Claims against
government will ‘rarely’
succeed: top court
Class counsel Allan Garber of Edmonton says Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin makes noteworthy statements on the
law of unjust enrichment, fiduciary duty and class certification.
DAN RIEDLHUBER FOR THE LAWYERS WEEKLY
See Fiduciary Page 3
THE LAWYERS WEEKLY
Vol. 22, No. 27 NEWS FOR THE LEGAL PROFESSION December 6, 2002
THE LAWYERS WEEKLY
VOL. 22, NO. 27 NEWS FOR THE LEGAL PROFESSION DECEMBER 6, 2002
PAGE 9
MIGHTY JUDGMENT
Book offers sanitized
look at the SCC
PAGE 13
Law firm hiring on rise
PAGE 21
BC law society expands powers of articling students
JEREMY HAINSWORTH VANCOUVER
Articling students in B.C. will
have an expanded role in representing clients as of Sept. 1 after
the Law Society of British Columbia (LSBC) approved amendments
to credentialing rules May 13.
The change means access to
certain legal services for the public
at lower rates than a lawyer would
charge.
But, benchers heard, principles
or supervising lawyers need to be
aware there will be disciplinary if
not insurance consequences if
work isn’t supervised properly.
Bencher David Renwick told
benchers the change means there
will be 300 more people available
to handle cases and improve access
to legal services.
Renwick said students would
be allowed to provide all legal services a lawyer can provide on the
proviso they are competent, properly supervised and properly prepared to provide those services.
LSBC disciplinary committee
chair Art Vertlieb added that
there will be
serious disci-
plinary conse-
quences if stu-
dents are not
adequately
supervised.
“That’s really
critical that
that’s brought home,” he said.
According to a May 3 memo
from the credentials committee,
under the newly adopted rule
articling students must not appear
as counsel on an appeal in the
Court of Appeal, the Federal Court
of Appeal or Supreme Court of
Canada, in a civil or criminal jury
trial or on a trial proceeding by way
of indictment in B.C. Supreme
Court unless the principal or
another practising lawyer is in
attendance at the time that the
court appearance is made and is
directly supervising the provision
of the service.
In other words, an articled stu-
dent may lead evidence or make
submissions under supervision.
As well, a student must not give
or accept an undertaking unless
their principal or another practising lawyer supervising the student
has also signed or accepted the
undertaking.
“They opened the door in the
right direction to help the pub-
lic,” said bencher Ken Walker,
who was lauded for the push to
begin an expanded role for stu-
dents in Kamloops, B.C. “It is a
high step forward and it is in the
public interest.”
“Students represent the future
of our profession and we, the
benchers, have a responsibility to
encourage, supervise and mentor
these students,” he said.
See Students Page 27
Vertlieb
THE LAWYERS WEEKLY
VOL. 22, NO. 27 NEWS FOR THE LEGAL PROFESSION DECEMBER 6, 2002
Smartpens way of future?
PAGE 24
To ensure your clients get the most comprehensive coverage in one title insurance policy,
take a look at the TitlePLUS® Program1, your Bar-related® real estate partner!
1-800-410-1013
titleplus.ca
1 Please refer to the policy for full details, including actual terms and conditions. The TitlePLUS policy is underwritten by Lawyers’ Professional Indemnity Company (LAWPRO®)/
Assurance LAWPRO®. Assurance LAWPRO is the registered name used in Québec by Lawyers' Professional Indemnity Company. Contact LAWPRO for brokers in Saskatchewan,
Manitoba, Alberta and Québec. TitlePLUS policies issued with respect to properties in Québec and OwnerEXPRESS® policies do not include legal services coverage.
® TitlePLUS, the TitlePLUS logo, OwnerEXPRESS, LA WPRO and Assurance LA WPRO are registered trademarks of Lawyers' Professional Indemnity Company.
® BAR-RELATED Mark is a registered Mark of North American Bar Related Title Insurers used by LAWPRO under License.
To subscribe to The Lawyers Weekly, visit
www.lawyersweekly.ca/subscribe
PUBLICATIONS MAIL AGREEMENT NO. 40065517