THE LAWYERS WEEKLY
August 20, 2010 | 23
BUSINESS
CAREERS
RYAN REMIOREZ / THE CANADIAN PRESS
Conrad Black and his wife Barbara Amiel leave court after his bail hearing at Federal Court on July 23, 2010 in Chicago.
Black’s war on taxes
Poor Lord Black of Cross-harbour! He is at war with the
United States government. Just as
his spirits were lifted by the judiciary — the United States Supreme
Court narrowed the scope of the
“honest services” doctrine so that
it would not apply to individuals in
his circumstances — resulting in
his being granted bail pending
further appeals. The executive
branch kicked him in the shins
with a US$71 million income tax
assessment for unpaid taxes and
penalties. Meanwhile, the Securities & Exchange Commission is
lurking in the background with its
civil charges.
Lord Black repudiates the tax
assessments, saying that he is not
liable for taxes as he is neither a
resident nor citizen of the United
States. If only tax law was that
simple.
Like Canada, the United States
bases its jurisdiction to tax on the
relationship between the taxpayer
and his or her residence in the
country. Residence based systems
typically tax persons on their
worldwide income.
Countries use economic and
social nexus with the country to
determine residence status. For
example, one may determine residence by factual criteria: physical
and financial nexus connections
with the country, a job, home,
family, bank accounts and social
connections.
Factually-based tests, however,
are necessarily uncertain. Hence,
some countries supplement such
criteria with more precise bright
line tests.
Canada, for example, deems a
taxpayer to be a resident if she or
he sojourns for 183 days or more
in the year in Canada. The United
States uses a more complex
weighted average formula that
looks at an individual’s presence in
the country over the immediate
past three years. Under the formula, an individual who is in the
country for more than 121 days a
year in each of the past three years
is deemed a U.S. resident.
To be sure, these are arbitrary
numbers. Nevertheless, they
TAX VIEWS
VERN
KRISHNA
“
As Lord [Conrad]
Black will no doubt
discover, the tax
collector is far more
brutal and subject
to fewer judicial
restraints than
the criminal
justice system.
provide some certainty in determining residence for tax purposes. However, they also create
the potential for double taxation
where one country claims jurisdiction over a taxpayer based on
his factual nexus with the country and another country claims
jurisdiction over the taxpayer
based on a mechanical rule. Tax
treaties attempt to resolve
double tax claims.
Most countries do not use
nationality as a basis for taxation.
The notable exception is the
United States, which taxes its citizens, regardless where they live.
U.S. citizens must file tax returns
even if they live abroad. However,
the U.S. exempts a substantial
portion of a non-resident citizen’s
foreign earnings from tax.
There is, however, a third basis
for taxation: source of income. The
theory of source-based taxation is
that the country where the income
originates should be entitled to tax
foreign investors who use the
country’s economic and political
resources to produce the income.
For example, regardless of resi-
dence or citizenship, a country
may tax a foreign investor who
derives investment or employ-
ment income in the country.
Vern Krishna is tax counsel
with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
and executive director of the CGA
Tax Research Centre at the Uni-
versity of Ottawa.
Research Solutions
Common Law, Civil Law and
the Future of Categories
New!
$85 + GS T
736 Pages • Softcover • May 2010
ISBN: 9780433462576
Do the Categories Have a Future?
Common Law, Civil Law and the Future of Categories presents the
first comprehensive and structured study of the divide between
civil and common law. The essays in this collection were originally
presented at the 2009 International Association of Procedural
Law conference in Toronto. Each essay tackles a topic significant
for litigators and other procedural lawyers in a bijural country,
underscoring the important impact this has on Canadian law.
Features and Benefits
• Authors, including leading scholars, academics, and
authorities on international law from 35 countries, for a truly
global perspective
• Introductory essays for each part of the book, taking a
comparative approach to the topic
• In-depth examination of controversial issues that blur the line
between categories, including:
° How common law integrates case management reforms to
resemble the judge-led procedure in the civil law
° How the increased use of oral hearings in civil law creates
similarities to the common law
Order Today!
Take advantage of the 30-Day Risk-Free; Examination!
www.lexisnexis.ca/bookstore 1-800-668-6481
(Price & other details are subject to change without notice.
We pay shipping & handling if payment accompanies order.)
† Pre-payment required for first-time purchasers.
Please quote Reservation Code 3306 when ordering.
IN HOUSE COUNSEL
Reserve your
ad space
now for the
October 2010
edition
Call for details
905-415-5805
or 1-800-668-6481 Ext. 805
The Lawyers Weekly
IN HOUSE COUNSEL
SPRING 2010 | FREE
The Lawyers Weekly
Weathering the
IN HOUSE COUNSEL N HOUSE COUNSEL
S TORM
STORM
S TORM
FALL2009|FREE
Going it
IN HOUSE COUNSEL
The Lawyers Weekly
ALONE
What to do when
disasters, from recalls
to class actions, hit
your organization
WINTER2008|FREE
CHALLENGE // PERSPECTIVE // CHANGE // VALUE // COSTS // FEES
// OU TSIDE COUNSEL // LEGAL SERVICES// PROFI T // DISPU TE //
FIRS T-YEAR ASSOCIATES // SALAR Y INCREASES // SECOND-YEAR
ASSOCIATES // MORE EXPENSIVE // JUS TIFIED // PAY // DISCOUNTS
// BILLING // HOURS // ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL
// FRUS TRATION // ANGER // SPENDING // HOURLY RA TE // TAKE
AC TION // VALUE // LEGAL COSTS // CLIEN T OBJEC TIVES // SOLU TIONS
// REASONABLE COSTS // OP TIMIZING PROFITS // ECONOMIC MODEL
// HIRING // EN TR Y-LEVEL // MANAGE SPENDING // LONG-TERM
RELATIONSHIP // CANADIAN CORPORATE COUNSEL ASSOCIA TION
// VALUE-FOR-MONE Y // REDUCE COS TS // TOOLS // OBJEC TIVE //
OPERATIONAL CHANGES //MINIMIZE //BONUS PLANS // RESOLUTION //
OVERBUYING // COLLABORATIVE // BUDGETING //
ESTIMATES // REFORMS // PROACTIVE // BUSINESS
STRATEGIES // RISK MANAGEMENT // KEY CONTRIBU TORS //
MARKETPLACE // DRIVE // AUDIT // PLAN // ON-THE JOB
TRAINING // WAL-MAR T // IDEN TIFY PROBLEMS // BUSINESS
PRINCIPLES // EFFICIENCY // MOTIVATION // TALENT //
COMPETENT // CONCERNS // REACTION // SUPPORTER
// COMMUNICATION // ALTERNATIVE // PARTNERING //
COUNTERINTUITIVE // ROUTINE // CONCEPT // CREATIVE //
FLAT-FEE // ASSESS // OUTCOME // DIALOGUE // THINKING //
SEMINARS // ARTICLING // QUALITY OF SERVICES // OVERBILLING
C
Ho w solo
in-house
counsel are
keeping
connected
PUTTING A STOP
O
Pro bono
g
Plus
H
TO RISING
UU
V
Outsourcing firms
for in-house counsel
In-house
counsel
lending
a hand
e
d
LAW FIRM FEES
O